Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Is Delta Anti-military?

I have a different view concerning the recent flap over Delta Airlines charging our military members for extra bags on flights. I know, I know, how dare Delta unfairly charge these heroes fees for extra baggage? Is Delta really being unfair or Un-American?
The issue arose after Delta charged several servicemen a premium for the extra baggage that they were required to carry to do their jobs. These were mostly weapons. The GI's made an issue with the media that they should not have been charged these fees because they are in the military. The media especially Fox News has made a huge deal about the fees and has called on Delta to stop charging military members for extra bags. There is also some congressman from CA who has introduced a resolution stating that airlines should charge the military for extra bags.
Now in general, I think that charging passengers of any profession for bags is a horrible idea. But this is the current policy of several airlines. The charges are, currently, the difference between profits and losses to the majority of carriers participating. They are significant streams of revenue. It has also been my experience Delta is very appreciative of the members of our military.
Here is my rub. First, these men are flying a commercial airline whose policy it is to charge for baggage. The airline makes no secret of this. The men should have known going in that the extra bags would incur a charge. Secondly, the soldiers are "employees" of the federal government. The weapons they carry are required to do their jobs. These fees should be paid by their "employer". If the "employer" doesn't want to pay the fees they can ship the weapons separately or could choose another airline that doesn't charge for extra baggage.
If an employee of any private business flies this airline to fulfill their job responsibilities, the company would be rightfully expected to pay the fees for the extra bags required to do that job.
Even though, this makes for a "feel-good" way of demonizing Delta, their policy was clearly stated and, in my opinion, they are not at all obligated to change their policy just because the passenger is employed by Uncle Sam.
~CjW

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

2010 Governor's Race

While I am not overly excited about either of the candidates for Georgia governor this year, several people have asked my opinion on who I support so here goes. Honestly, this decision if very easy for me. And if anyone looks at the stance of each candidate, it should be easy for them.
Because of the current state and platform of the Democratic Party, I would not even consider voting for anyone who associated themselves with the Democrats. But besides that there are many reasons not to support Roy Barnes for Governor of Georgia. A short visit to roy2010.com will provide all the information needed to make a decision against this candidate.
Economics: Barnes states the obvious that the economy of the state is priority one this year. His highest priority?
"One of my first orders of business will be to retrofit every state building and public school in Georgia for clean, efficient energy consumption – this includes the use of low-flow toilets and the expansion of our sewer systems where necessary. These projects will reduce the state’s energy and water costs in the long run, while putting Georgians back to work right now."
This goes right to the heart of why Democrats understand nothing about economics or business. This solution is so ridiculous that it requires no explanation.
Barnes' second proposal to address the state's economic woes: Education, another liberal default. He states, "Businesses need capable workers, and they are more likely to move to Georgia if we can provide a qualified workforce." He continues, "Education is closely linked to job creation, so we must do all we can to equip Georgians to take advantage of the job opportunities of the future." No, job creation is not very closely linked to education. And while I think that a capable workforce is important to certain businesses in a normal climate, in today's climate what businesses need most is customers. A workforce of Ph. D.'s cannot create demand.
There is no question that this lack of understanding or lack of effort in trying to understand the real economic issues facing Georgia families is reason enough to scratch Roy Barnes from consideration as our next governor.
Nathan Deal's highest priority? Decrease the tax burden on businesses in Georgia fostering an environment of growth in the state. Bingo! That is exactly what is needed. That is exactly why I will be voting for Nathan Deal for Georgia's next governor!
Vote!

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Civilian Conservation Corps: Government Jobs


For many years, my family leased 900 acres of hunting land at the pinnacle of Fouche Gap. For me, an outdoor fanatic, it was heaven. This property was perhaps the most remote slice of wilderness you could find in Floyd County.

The terrain was very steep and the hollows were populated by huge hardwoods. The tops of the high ridges were where the scrub pines grew. The poor quality of these pines and the ruggedness of the mountains were probably the reason this large tract was never deforested.

Of the many memories I have of hunting and scouting this particular property, the first images are seared in my consciousness. In the early years of the lease, we spent many hours exploring practically every acre. During these expeditions we were shocked to find a large formation of rocks that that were organized into a make-shift worship sanctuary. It was very simple, but stunning to a young man not used to seeing this type of image in the outdoors. It was completely out of place.

One large rock was completely painted white on one side. On the white surface was inscribed, in black, a verse of scripture. (I wish I had wrote down the particular passage, but i just don't remember.) There were smaller rocks organized in what appeared to be seating for those in attendance. I have to say it was pretty erie standing there. Many questions flooded my mind surrounding this scene.

As we continued to explore the tract we found another interesting landmark that lead to answers concerning the sanctuary. At exactly 1100 feet of elevation there was a perfectly engineered trail that lead completely around the mountain. Literally miles and miles of trail had been built for, what seemed to my mind, no reason whatsoever. A little research revealed the origin of the trail and subsequently the rock formation.

During the Great Depression there were groups of young, unemployed Americans organized and employed by the Federal government to complete "conservation" projects. They were paid $1 per day for their labor. Apparently, the group building this trail remained on the mountain for extended periods of time so they created the sanctuary for a place to worship.

This program, the Civilian Conservation Corps, was conceived and implemented by the icon of progressives: Franklin Delano Roosevelt. So, in the name of compassion, FDR created low paying "busy work" for the unemployed instead of actually stimulating the economy so that they could find meaningful work in the private sector.

The sad history of the United States during the early 1930's is constantly referred to by progressives as a shining example of how big government is the answer to major economic problems. But, as with many historical events, the political account of the era has been a distortion of the actual facts.

In a four year study, two UCLA economists have concluded that FDR's policies did not rescue our economy, but more likely, prolonged the depression by seven years. This evidence combined with the history of the depression of the early 1920's and President Warren G. Harding's response provide great insight into why the current administration's stimulus spending is proving to be complete failure. The government cannot create wealth. Only the private sector can.

Today we hear talk of jobs "saved" or created. And it is true that millions of Americans do work for state and federal government. But the overwhelming number of the employed in the United States work for small or medium-sized private enterprise. The question is, is government effective in "rescuing" the economy or buffering us from down cycles? The answer is a resounding no.

However, there is an important part the government can play in economic recovery. It has absolutely nothing to do with debt and spending. But as Warren G. Harding demonstrated, the role of government is to empower the private sector by lowering taxes, removing obstacles, and lowering the cost of entry to markets for entrepreneurs. This freedom will result in economic growth. Private sector growth is the way out of recession.

Government growth during recession encourages dependence and decreases the incentive for risk taking. Are these worthless, unproductive "jobs" of the Civilian Conservation Corps the type of job Americans want? Or is the path of freedom and individual accomplishment more in line with human nature? I prefer to take risks and succeed or fail on my own merit.

Sunday, July 04, 2010

Independence Day



On this day in 1776 our forefathers placed the pointy finger of righteous liberty in the fat face of tyranny and said, "No more!" And with one of the greatest of all documents penned by the hand of a man, made their stand having measured the weight of its consequences. And the thirteen United States unanimously ratifying the declaration, boldly proclaimed that our rights are not given by any man, or government, but are graciously granted to us by our Creator!
God bless this land and let us be brave stewards of this miraculous republic!

(Scene depicted by John Trumbull.)

Friday, June 25, 2010

TUM

Hear ye, hear ye!

This kind of consistent message makes me nervous some times. But when I am hit with stuff more than once, my ears perk up a little.
II Samuel 6:14-16, 22
David, wearing a linen ephod, danced before the LORD with all his might, while he and the entire house of Israel brought up the ark of the LORD with shouts and the sound of trumpets. As the ark of the LORD was entering the City of David, Michal daughter of Saul watched from a window. And when she saw King David leaping and dancing before the LORD, she despised him in her heart.
I will become even more undignified than this, and I will be humiliated in my own eyes. But by these slave girls you spoke of, I will be held in honor." (NIV)
1.- Joseph Cochran @ NRCOG last Sunday.

2.- Sportsmen's Devotional for June 25, 2010

I'm listening...

We Must Decrease?

It has been an unbelievable year and a half. There is no doubt that our economy is struggling. As a businessman, I am well aware of the challenges that we face daily. Times are tough for the vast majority of Americans. The world economies are in turmoil. So what is the solution?

My opinions are well documented on this page and my facebook page. The other countries of Europe seem to have come the stark realization that unfettered governmental spending is weakening their fundamental financial underpinnings. Germany, Britain, Spain and Greece have all began to institute austerity measures to greatly reduce the size of government.

What some of these countries still haven't embraced is the one driver that will unleash the private sector in their economies to create jobs and fuel real economic expansion: lower taxation. This missing link will be realized eventually by the leaders of Europe.

But has our government learned these lessons yet? Unfortunately, our current national leadership are convinced that the federal government is the engine that will pull us out of this economic downturn. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Furthermore, while most of Europe has awakened to the reality of the failure of the social state as an economic plus, our President is pressuring those countries to "invest" more in government largesse. There are no historical examples to support his position. So is he trying to justify his policy? Does misery love company? Or is there some reason that is much more specious?

Could it be that President Obama's agenda, moving the US closer to a socialistic society, is more important to his administration than the financial well being of America and Americans?
I don't know the answer to that, but it is very suspicious that we are totally ignoring history and barreling head-long toward financial disaster. Read the following quote from our President, carefully, and decide for yourself what his intentions are:

"More broadly, just to widen out the challenges that the world economy faces, we said in Pittsburgh in the G20 that it was important for us to rebalance in part because the U.S. economy for a long period of time was the engine of world economic growth; we were sucking in imports from all across the world financed by huge amounts of consumer debt. Because of the financial crisis, but also because that debt was fundamentally unsustainable, the United States is not going to be able to serve in that same capacity to that same extent.

We are obviously still a huge part of the world economy. We are still going to be open. We are still going to be importing as well as exporting. But the economic realities are such that for us to see sustained global economic growth, all countries are going to have to be moving in some new directions.

That was acknowledged in Pittsburgh. That means that surplus countries are going to have to think about how are we spurring domestic demand. That means that emerging countries are going to have to think are we only oriented towards exports, or are we also starting to produce manufacturing goods and services for the internal market. It means that deficit countries have to start getting serious about their midterm and long-term debt and deficits. And that includes the United States of America, which is why I've got a fiscal commission that's going to be reporting to me by the end of the year.

So the point is not every country is going to respond exactly the same way, but all of us are going to have responsibilities to rebalance in ways that allow for long-term, sustained economic growth in which all countries are participating and, hopefully, the citizens of all these countries are benefiting."
-Barak Obama, June 24, 2010

Saturday, March 13, 2010

SiteLauncher (Firefox Add-On) - Sponsored Post

SiteLauncher (Firefox Add-On) - www.donesmart.com
SiteLauncher makes accessing your most commonly used sites much more efficient. Check it out!

sponsored like
Christopher Wood's profile on MyLikes

Friday, March 12, 2010

Atlas "Axl" Von Rogers-Hutte

On Valentine's Day I flew to St. Louis, MO to pick up my newest hunting buddy. If you are my Facebook friend then you have already heard all about him. So, If this is a review for you I apologize in advance.
My other dogs are getting older so Tonya and I (wink, wink) decided it was time to bring another hound into the fold so he will be ready when needed. (Actually, I decided and she gave me permission.)
Axl is a Deutsch Drahthaar. This is a very unique breed of versatile gun dogs that are capable of pointing upland game, Retrieving waterfowl, and blood tracking furred animals. In the past I had setters for upland hunting and Labradors for waterfowl. With limited time to hunt, I found I wasn't being fair to either breed. So I began a search for a versatile breed that could I could give more time to.

So here is the guy who has stolen our heart and has already become my best buddy.



This is Axl in the airport in STL just after we went through security.


We are back in ATL and headed to Rome.


Looong day and Axl was soo tired after we got home.


Axl Crashed out in my office.


He's definitely part of the family already!


Axl on point at 1o week of age...Wow!


Me and Axl in the lab at AAT, Inc. corporate offices.

Hope you enjoyed these and I will try to keep you up to date on his progress as the training continues.
Greatlife...